And so this brings to light the very simple, yet impactful opportunity in strategic sourcing to your bottom line. Synchronizing procurement efforts across an organization can have immediate effects to costs. This should come as no surprise as you think about companies who do this extremely well including Wal-Mart (the epitome of operational excellence), UPS, The Home Depot, etc. Strategic sourcing empowers your procurement organization reap the benefits of supplier competition. And today, there are many ways to empower your company’s procurement strategy...
- As a Consultant, I was part of a small team leading the transformation of the Procurement organization of a major IT outsourcing company with spend across global business units. Over the next several years, the organization looked to reign overall Procurement spend with immediate savings through an e-Sourcing solution.
- The implementation of an e-Sourcing system enabled the company to leverage RFx templates and run auction events to drive down costs and enable supplier competition for its more than 1,000 vendors and more than a 100 internal procurement categories.
- I spent a few years as a Procurement Analyst within a major third-party logistics company’s Procurement group within its Transportation organization. Third-party logistics companies are the very shining examples of strategic sourcing. I supported the management of largely truckload and less-than-truckload carriers on behalf of our customers analyzing transportation costs, rate changes, and provided lane-carrier recommendations. At the end of the day, upper-tier carriers are very similar. Yet, when you review RFP bids, some carriers bid with 30% premiums over their competitors.
- Further benefits of strategic sourcing (and 3PLs) include “soft” benefits which at first are hard to quantify until service failures arise (in this example). Aside from numbers, Procurement empowerment meant also assessing suppliers’ qualitative bid as well. For example, being a low cost provider counts for naught should a carrier’s on-time performance be well below top-tier standards (99.8% oftentimes).
- Other activities included the analysis of rate increase requests. Our strategic goal here was mitigate costs as much as possible reducing rate increases, fuel surcharge increases, accessorials, etc.